mukagen: (pic#14603369)
gojou satoru ([personal profile] mukagen) wrote2021-03-20 07:24 pm
Entry tags:
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€palamedes as in me)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-24 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[Kind of a pang of negative feelings, here. Something a little personal and shameful.]

It is. It's rare for children to be born necromancers in general and hardly a guarantee even among families that have the lineage, but it is essential for the Houses to have a sufficient number, and the heir to the House must be a necromancer. It isn't so much a matter of preference as it is survival; where we live would not be habitable without necromantic techniques.
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€but bags of bones)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-25 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
[Nodding. Here you go, here's your bone lore.]

Well, as I said, it is all a matter of the energy of life and death - thalergy and thanergy. All living beings in the universe produce both. Thalergy is what is generated by things that are alive, but it is not especially conducive to manipulation. You can burn thalergy to do a few things, but it is not efficient. Thanergy is generated by decay. A living creature, at low levels, is always generating thanergy as well from cellular decay. But the more complex the organism that dies, the more thanergy will be generated, so it is essentially a waste to harvest thanergy from anything without sentience.

The greatest production of thanergy comes at the bloom of death in a sentient being and approximately thirty to sixty seconds after. Sentient beings have spirits, and the apopneumatism that occurs when the spirit is forced from the body causes a thanergetic cascade. From this comes the typical combat application of necromancy, wherein a necromancer is paired with a swordsman who will generate death for the purposes of thanergy production, which can then be utilized by a necromancer in a variety of techniques. However, beyond the initial bloom, corpses still generate significant amounts of thanergy. The fresher the corpse, the more potent the thanergy generation.

From here you have the specialties. Each House has their own particular methods and techniques for which they are known, but they all principally deal in similar methods of thanergy generation and three specialties. There are necromancers who deal primarily in matters of the spirit, the soul. Either by siphoning energy from souls of the living, or calling souls that have been separated from the body. Flesh magicians tend to make use of the thanergy of corpses, though skilled ones can also draw thanergy from living bodies. My House specializes in bone. Bone is less potent than a cadaver with flesh on it, but it has the advantage of lasting, and it serves as a highly effective conduit for thanergy. My technique is principally to infuse bone with additional thanergy - I can store the additional energy from the initial bloom, which I can then carry with me and draw from later; I can also manipulate the bone into other forms and grow it.

This method also bypasses the need to generate fresh corpses in order to be effective in combat. Most of the dead I've drawn thanergy from were of my household, and died naturally before their conversion.

So I fear that I am no spirit expert, which would be the most comparable to what you deal in, but I do understand the fundamental principles of it better than your standard spirit caller, because I am very good.
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€palamedes as in me)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-26 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It's my House's traditional technique, yes - but I have mastered it beyond what my ancestors ever thought to achieve with it. I've never really had a swordsman of any worth to rely on to begin with.

[Just bluntly putting that out there. She has a big ego, but she also feels this is an honest assessment.]

. . . There has been an assumption by certain parties that necromancy means I mind less about murder, which is bizarre to me. I still don't enjoy the notion of people I am friendly with being killed? [But whatever.] I mean more that I view the theory differently. I've had conversations with Greed and Gluttony of what becomes of corpses here and what is eating them, and it is difficult because I know they do not have the same academic framework as I do so I fear whether I am correctly parsing their questions. Greed once prompted me to acknowledge the difference between someone living and someone dead is whether their soul remains in their body, which is actually a gross oversimplification.

Besides that, I'd say the difference is primarily that the notion of being sentimental over remains is an odd one to me. [She'll point to one of her bone bracelets.] This came from a woman who was often my nursemaid as a child. When she died, I harvested her bone as I would any other cadaver. She would have considered it an honour.
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€but bags of bones)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-27 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose they might, if I explained it. But to me, it doesn't even have that level of sentimental value. They are only remains.

[So like. The idea that people care about being respectful towards dead bodies, or find them unsettling. . . doesn't make sense.]

Cursed energy isn't something I'm familiar with, either. I mentioned revenants before; these are often caused by the shock of a soul leaving a body during a violent death, which can cause parts of the soul to fragment and form violent creatures. They are also rarely sentient; only in unusual circumstances does a revenant retain enough components of the soul to form something like a ghost, with awareness and personality.
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€to get their bones from you)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-28 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It's possible, but I can't say I've spent much time worrying about it. They're fairly rare, and I would be dead.

[But that does sound interesting.]

Are you afraid of becoming a curse?
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€palamedes as in me)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-29 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh.

[Somehow she finds this a little amusing, in a way that's like - so that's your deal.]

If you're really so clever, can't you find a better way to resolve that problem? Make plans to deal with it in advance? Or do you only have brute strength without the intelligence to back it up?
bonetiddies: (đŸ’€palamedes as in me)

[personal profile] bonetiddies 2021-03-30 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
[See, what she does appreciate about Gojou is she said that in the meannest way possible, and he just took the question in the spirit it was intended and answered.]

So you have thought it through. I expected as much.